Posts

Showing posts from July, 2014

Merits of One person Company - Moneylife

Merits of One person Company - Moneylife

ഇന്നു ലോക സംഗീതദിനം: 109ന്റെ നിറവിലും സോപാനസംഗീതത്തിന്റെ ശ്രുതിമുറിയാതെ പത്മനാഭമാരാര്‍ | mangalam.com

ഇന്നു ലോക സംഗീതദിനം: 109ന്റെ നിറവിലും സോപാനസംഗീതത്തിന്റെ ശ്രുതിമുറിയാതെ പത്മനാഭമാരാര്‍ | mangalam.com My online comment posted on July 31, 2014(so far there is only one online comment posted here): Thanks to P P Ramachandran and Dr T V Gopalakrishnan through whom I received this report. Being an ‘ambalavaasi’ myself, even without meeting Padmanabha Marar myself, I can feel his presence. My ‘vineethanamaskaram’ to him. M G Warrier  

Super achievement | Business Line

Super achievement | Business Line Please read my letter under "Big price loans" Submitted version copied below: ‘Dis’-credit to education This refers to the report “Failure to repay an education loan may cost you dearly”(July 30). The report brings out in one place the background in which education loan, as a category of bank credit, has come to the present disgraceful position. The government policy, banks’ attempt to ‘pluck low hanging fruits’ to meet priority sector targets, greed of educational institutions to earn more by linking cost of seats in professional colleges to loan eligibility, failure to popularise a reasonably acceptable level of repayment ethics at least among the ‘educated’ poor law enforcement and above all a sense of ‘pride’ created in the minds of high profile defaulters have all contributed to the present impasse. The position can be retrieved by: i)                First ensuring that those beneficiaries who are now defaulter

Failure to repay an education loan may cost you dearly | Business Line

Failure to repay an education loan may cost you dearly | Business Line ‘Dis’-credit to education This refers to the report “Failure to repay an education loan may cost you dearly”(July 30, 2014). The report brings out in one place the background in which education loan, as a category of bank credit, has come to the present disgraceful position. The government policy, banks’ attempt to ‘pluck low hanging fruits’ to meet priority sector targets, greed of educational institutions to earn more by linking cost of seats in professional colleges to loan eligibility, failure to popularise a reasonably acceptable level of repayment ethics at least among the ‘educated’ poor law enforcement and above all a sense of ‘pride’ created in the minds of high profile defaulters have all contributed to the present impasse. The position can be retrieved by: i)                First ensuring that those beneficiaries who are now defaulters and have the repaying capacity repay the loans

Letters: Trust deficit | Business Standard Opinion

Letters: Trust deficit | Business Standard Opinion Submitted version: Trust deficit This refers to the article “Trust in reform”(July 29, 2014). The article cogently put forth the case for building trust in those who really participate in the India Growth Story, but still remain a neglected lot when it comes to sharing the benefits of their efforts.   Those at the helm should remember that there is a perceivable difference between the thinking of managers and workers of pre-reform days and those who have joined these categories during the current century. For a moment, let us forget the   public-private sector divide. The need to keep managers and workers equally satisfied and secure for improving productivity is an aspect well brought out in the article. The conflict between those who want to treat employees (including managers and workers) as partners and those who want to exploit labour as much as possible will continue so long as the ownership of resources and

Shubhashis Gangopadhyay: Trust in reform | Business Standard Opinion

Shubhashis Gangopadhyay: Trust in reform | Business Standard Opinion Online comments posted on July 29, 2014: The article cogently puts forth the case for building trust in those who really participate in the India Growth Story, but still remain a neglected lot when it comes to sharing the benefits of their efforts. Those at the helm should remember that there is a perceivable difference between the thinking of managers and workers of pre-reform days and those who have joined these categories during the current century. For a moment, let us forget the   public-private sector divide. The need to keep managers and workers equally satisfied and secure for improving productivity is an aspect well brought out in the article. The conflict between those who want to treat employees (including managers and workers) as partners and those who want to exploit labour as much as possible will continue so long as the ownership of resources and laws governing their management contin