Give Them a Secure Future
The Economic Times
Letters
Give
them a secure future
18 Oct, 2013, 04.00AM IST
This refers to 'The Future is Now. Stop Building for
Yesterday' (ET, Oct 17).
Developed countries may be worried about future shock, but a majority of the Indian population still struggles to reach the internationally accepted poverty line of $2 expenditure per person per day.
The perception that "the stable economy where people had a job for life is more or less over" is true, and even the social security systems such as family and pension are disintegrating.
As rightly argued by the author, there is a need for serious debates on how to insulate future generation from unanticipated shocks caused by mismanagement of resources by the present generation.
M G Warrier, Mumbai
Developed countries may be worried about future shock, but a majority of the Indian population still struggles to reach the internationally accepted poverty line of $2 expenditure per person per day.
The perception that "the stable economy where people had a job for life is more or less over" is true, and even the social security systems such as family and pension are disintegrating.
As rightly argued by the author, there is a need for serious debates on how to insulate future generation from unanticipated shocks caused by mismanagement of resources by the present generation.
M G Warrier, Mumbai
Also read the
unedited version copied below:
Present tense
This refers to the article ‘The
Future is Now.Stop Building for Yesterday’(October 17). The crisp and condensed
agenda for planning with a better India for next generation’s hopes and
aspirations in mind, coming from an individual who has been through the mill in
the Indian context-business, bureaucracy and now politics, if media is to be believed-
will be welcomed by the target audience, which apparently is the creamy layer
of Indian population who are eight times richer than their great grand-fathers.
It may be true that developed
countries are worried about future shock. But ours is a country with majority
of the population yet struggling to reach the first step of the ladder of
development, assuming that first step is, coming above the internationally
accepted poverty line of $2 expenditure per person per day.
The perception that ‘the stable
economy where people had a job for life is more or less over’ is true and even
the social security systems like family and pension are getting disintegrated
and dismantled to conform to ‘developed world’ norms.
As rightly argued by the author,
there is need for serious debates on how to insulate future generation from
unanticipated shocks caused by pure mismanagement of resources by present
generation. Though comparison may be far-fetched, the shame US is going through
sitting on a debt of over 15 trillion dollars should be a warning signal for
all policy makers.
M G WARRIER, Mumbai
Comments