Legislation of law and administration of justice: Doe a conflict exist?
http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/why-make-a-show-of-patriotism-sc-judge/article19908924.ece
Law and justice
This
refers to the report “Why make a show of patriotism: SC judge” (The Hindu, October
24). As generally people are averse to commenting on court observations,
Justice Chandrachud’s terse observations in the open court may not attract much
public attention till another petition is filed in the Apex Court on the
subject or Centre decides to consider another legislation to uphold the dignity
of National Anthem. Allowing ‘law to take its course’, one is tempted to divert
into a general issue which deserves public debate. This relates to legislation
of laws and the role of courts in administration of justice.
Viewed
from a different angle, one feels that, of late, legislatures, from Parliament
down to Gram Panchayats are not devoting enough time for deliberating on the
various aspects of the laws they make or judicial or quasi-judicial decisions
they take. This results in a situation where legislative decisions get
questioned in courts of law much faster than this happened in the past. The side
effect is, courts get confused about matters which they should handle and
matters which should be left to be handled by other authorities which have been
traditionally handling and settling local or sectoral issues amicably, applying
commonsense, without hairsplitting letters of the statute book.
Perhaps,
political leadership and judiciary should have a dialogue at the highest level
on legislation of law and administration of justice without compromising the
basic features of Indian Constitution and safeguarding public interest without
hurting patriotic or religious sentiments.
M G Warrier, Thiruvananthapuram
Comments