Pension age in Kerala
Business Line, March 18, 2013
Letters
Pension scheme
This refers to the
report “Retirement age raised to 60 for new recruits” (Business Line,
March 16).
It is intriguing
that the Kerala Finance Minister has proposed raising the retirement age of a
category of employees who are yet to join the service at a time when his
government is struggling for existence. This is likely to be interpreted as a
gimmick to divide opinion and divert attention from crucial issues. The
‘innocent’ omission of the relevant proposal while delivering the Budget Speech
makes the motives murkier.
M. G. Warrier
e-mail
(This article was
published on March 17, 2013)
March 16,
2013
The Editor
Hindu Business Line
Letters
Kerala pension age
This refers to the report
“Retirement age raised to 60 for new recruits” (March 16). Business Line is one
of the few newspapers which did not use the words ‘pension age’ while reporting
appropriately the raising of ‘retirement age’ announced in the Kerala budget
2013-14. ‘Pension’, by definition, is a government commitment to make regular
payment to people above a specified age. The new entrants to government service
in Kerala from April 1, 2013 and the employees covered by New Pension Scheme
introduced by central government for employees (excluding defence services)
joining service from January 1, 2004 and identical and slightly modified
schemes introduced by various state governments and public sector organisations
variously known as ‘Contributory Pension Scheme’, ‘Participatory Pension
Scheme’ and so on, from various subsequent dates are not eligible for pension
as understood in the common parlor so far. Viewed from this angle, even the
nomenclature ‘New Pension Scheme’ is a misnomer.
It is intriguing that the Kerala
FM has chosen to propose raising the retirement age of a category of employees
who are yet to join the service at a time his government itself is struggling
for existence. This is likely to be interpreted as a gimmick to divide opinion
and divert attention from immediate crucial issues. The ‘innocent’ omission of
the relevant proposal while delivering the Budget Speech makes the motives
murkier.
M G Warrier, Thiruvananthapuram
Comments