Why states dare to give NPS a miss | Business Standard
Why states dare to give NPS a miss | Business Standard
Online comments posted on November 3, 2013:
Online comments posted on November 3, 2013:
The article gives a brief history
and the present state of affairs of NPS(earlier New Pension System/Scheme and
now National Pension System). For reasons best known to them, media, trade
unions and organisations of employees affected by NPS and even political
parties are observing a learned silence about the mess created by substituting
a pension system which was being administered fairly well from a social
security angle by NPS which in effect is ‘No Pension Scheme’. This article exposes
the helplessness of PFRDA whose decade old existence is being legalised now.
One gets curious by the following
observations made by PFRDA Chairman quoted in the article:
· "
I have no means to ensure compliance from state
governments.
·
In one month, states’ contribution is 100 per
cent, the next month it falls to 50 per cent and the next it becomes zero.
·
Till the time money is lying with the state
governments, they pay an interest at par with the prevailing rate on government
security, which is roughly around eight per cent. Whereas our rate of return
has been 12-14 per cent.
·
There is no question of NPS giving guaranteed
return. The new legislation talks about giving subscribers access to a product
which gives minimum assured return."
If someone is clear about the
efficiency of NPS as a substitute for the pension scheme it has replaced,
please elucidate the above observations made by PFRDA Chairman.
M
G Warrier, Mumbai
Comments