Fight for protecting pension rights...
July 24, 2017
Indian Pension System: Time for review
Ramanath
Nakhate’s letter captioned “United fight for pension” (Business Standard, July 24) gives deep
insight into the plight of a section of pensioners who retired from some public
sector institutions. The reasons for GOI and organizations like LIC, RBI and
PSBs in which pension schemes had been introduced during 1990’s lending a deaf
ear to genuine demands for pension revision may be different from those being
shared in public. To understand that, one may have to first have a look at the
present status of pension scheme applicable to central government employees.
By
an executive order issued in December 2003, GOI successfully divided central
government employees into three classes for the purpose of pension benefits:
(i)
Employees who were in service as on
December 31, 2003, who will continue to enjoy the benefits of ‘Defined Benefit
Pension Scheme’ which was in existence on that day, for life (Assuming the
employee who joined on December 31, 2003 at the age of 25 may retire in 2038
and assuming the person live up to the age of 80, the pension scheme will
remain in force till the year 2058).
(ii)
Defence Personnel: Serving and new
defence personnel (joining after December 31, 2003) will continue to enjoy the
benefit of Defined Benefit Pension Scheme.
(iii)
Central government employees joining
service on or after January 1, 2004 will be covered by a “Defined
Contribution-based pension scheme” called NPS (New Pension Scheme, later
rechristened as ‘National Pension System’) where employees’ contribution of 10
per cent of salary will be augmented with a matching contribution of 10 percent
by the employer. NPS differs from the old Contributory Provident Fund only in
regard to certain details in regard to provisions relating to investment/fund
management/withdrawal.
The
reason given for introduction of NPS was
rising pension liabilities. The pension liability may start tapering only after
a few more decades. All these call for a comprehensive review of the Indian
Pension System to make it capable of ensuring reasonable retirement benefits to
all who are in regular employment. NPS is no substitute for the pension scheme
it has replaced. Pensioners’ demand for periodic upward revision factoring in
the changes in costs and living conditions is genuine.
M G Warrier,
Mumbai
Comments