Deciphering Congress' NYAY
Deciphering NYAY
This refers to the commonsense approach to NYAY in Karan Thapar’s piece
“Congress’ NYAY: Unanswered questions” (Business Standard, As I see it, April 1). As a “Minimum
Income Guarantee Scheme” is an idea worth pursuing, the debate on NYAY may
survive this election, irrespective of Congress’ fortunes.
As part of his sales talk for promoting his new book “Third Pillar” Dr
Raghuram Rajan was also seen justifying NYAY (Hindi word for justice), making
the common man wondering whether he is still on theory and doesn’t want to go
deep into the ground level realities of ‘poverty cultivation’ in India, even
after his research for writing the “Third Pillar”. In India the system is apparently
comfortable to retain a target ‘catchment area’ of people below poverty line
poor and illiterate, to ensure availability of cheap labour (now rechristened
as ‘outsourced work’) in different sectors. It is in this context that we are
prepared to dole out a portion of taxpayers’ money to keep a ‘reserve’ of
illiterate and idle people who will be available on call at starvation wages to
do unskilled work without any demand for fair wages.
The arithmetic which is making Karan Thapar uncomfortable may be ignored
by the common man and any word uttered against NYAY is likely to be interpreted
as a criticism against the proposal for ‘Minimum Income Guarantee’ which is a
noble concept.
Like the Employment Guarantee Schemes already in operation there is a
case for a comprehensive scheme, if possible outside the government budgets,
having the following features:
(i)
Target beneficiaries should be from
outside those covered by existing statutory schemes for social security, and
those who are in the employable age group. Say, 20 to 60 age group considering
all skilled/unskilled jobs for which they will be available on call. The
prospective beneficiaries can be asked to register with Employment Registers or
Special Desks created for the purpose in offices of Municipal Corporations or
LSG Offices.
(ii)
The payment should be to unemployed
members of families which have no earning members with income over a
pre-decided threshold limit and limited to the real gap between the threshold
level and the actual.
(iii)
The funding could be from a corpus
created by contributions from prospective employers who will benefit from the
skill development initiatives and the availability of candidates with identified
skills. While employment is provided through the scheme, a fixed percentage of
the wages matched by an equal contribution from the employer could be retained
for post-job social security of the beneficiaries.
M G Warrier, Mumbai
Comments